|
Post by account_disabled on Feb 12, 2024 8:55:51 GMT
We know that follow links have been played to death in the past, so it makes sense to make this particular element less important in the overall mix. You can still tell a lot about a site and how many people are talking about it. No Follow By definition, links do not convey equity or interest to the website. We know this for sure. What's less clear is what, if anything, it actually passed. Google is certainly aware that these links exist, and this latest patent may indicate that they are paying a little more attention to them than they let on. The patent highlights the importance of reference queries and implicit links, and that Google Botswana Email List wants to discount links from the same group or brand and instead wants to focus on independent links from unrelated domains. Importantly, was not mentioned, indicating that other factors are being measured based on the equity delivered by each individual link or mention. Mentioning to read because it is black and white evidence that Google considers mentions a measure of authority. After all, it’s only logical that a popular brand will have more people talking about it online than a brand that’s good at manipulating algorithms and investing heavily in building links to do so. Our sample findings support this, with larger, more well-known brands generally attracting more mentions than other brands. Testing Of course, the question remains, is this already in use.
|
|